Introduction | First Usage Notes | First Visited Sky Objects |First Observations | First Observation Experiences | First Conclusions | Links
On this page, I describe my very first experiences with my electronic refractor telescope Dwarf mini 30 mm/150 mm (f/5).
See also:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Photo: My Dwarf mini (Jan 2026)
...
![]() |
![]() |
Photo: Dwarf mini during charging
Here I list the deep sky objects that I observed and photographed initially with the Dwarf mini:
In the following I describe my very first experiences with the Dwarf mini from the first 11 observation sessions (Mühlhausen/Kraichgau).
![]() |
![]() |
|||
M 42/43, unprocessed, original |
M 33, unprocessed, original |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Screenshot of the App while observing M 42/43 |
M 42/43, DB filter, processed with Stellar Studio and further processed, section |
M 33, processed with Stellar Studio and further processed, section |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
IC 1396, unprocessed, original |
M 31/32/110, unprocessed, original |
M 31/32/110, processed, original |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
IC 1396 processed with Stellar Studio and further processed, original |
M 31/32/110, processed with Stellar Studio, original |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
NGC 1499, unprocessed, original |
NGC 7000/IC 5070, unprocessed, original |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
NGC 1499, processed with Stellar Studio and further processed, original |
NGC 7000/IC 5070, processed with Stellar Studio and further processed, original |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
M 45, unprocessed, original |
M 78, unprocessed, original |
M 42/43, DB filter, unprocessed, original |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
M 45, processed with Stellar Studio and further processed, section, original |
M 78, processed with Stellar Studio and further processed, section, original |
M 42/43, DB filter, processed with Stellar Studio and further processed, section, original |
![]() |
![]() |
|
NGC 1499, processed with Stellar Studio and further processed, original |
NGC 2024/B 33, processed with Stellar Studio and further processed, original |
Since mosaics are only optimally assembled with Stellar Studio, I do not show any unedited images.
Notes:
Photos see page Observations of the Moon.
Photos see page Observations of the Moon.
Photos of the moon see page Observations of the Moon. I restacked M 15 to eliminate disturbed photos. Here, I only show the restacked photo. This time, I only present the photos in their post-processed versions.
![]() |
![]() |
|
M 15, 27 min, processed with Stellar Studio, re-stacked original |
M 34, 35 min, processed with Stellar Studio, original |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
NGC 752 (C 28), 22.5 min, processed with Stellar Studio, original |
NGC 891, 45,5 min, processed with Stellar Studio and further processed, original |
Photographed the sun in the afternoon (at about 3 p.m.) 4Took 4x photos with 20 subs each, which were stacked; post-processing with Stellar Studio brought no improvement...
Photos see page Observations of the Sun.
Started the Dwarf mini in EQ mode around 7:45 p.m.. At the beginning, I did not understand the instructions for the corrections: when the advised "higher", it meant "lower" (reducing the angle). During the first correction I made the angle larger and the error promptly grew from 9° to 14°. Then I tried the other way around and suddenly I was within 2° ;) So I was ready for the observations!
Thereafter, I stopped my observations because of clouds...
![]() |
![]() |
|
M 31, 50 min, mosaic, processed with Stellar Studio, original |
M 34, 50 min, mosaic, processed with Stellar Studio, original |
Thereafter, I stopped my observations because of clouds...
![]() |
![]() |
|
M 42/43, 50 min, mosaic, processed with Stellar Studio, original |
NGC 2244, 50 min, processed with Stellar Studio, original |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
NGC 2244, 50 min, processed with Stellar Studio and additionally strongly processed, original |
NGC 2264 with NGC 2261, 50 min, processed with Stellar Studio and additionally processed, original |
![]() |
![]() |
|
IC 405/410, 50 min, DuoBand filter, mosaic, gain 60, processed with Stellar Studio, original |
IC 405/410, 50 min, DuoBand filter, mosaic, gain 60, processed with Stellar Studio and further post-processed, original |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
IC 405/410, 50 min, DuoBand filter, mosaic, gain 120, processed with Stellar Studio, Original |
IC 405/410, 50 min, DuoBand filter, mosaic, gain 120, processed with Stellar Studio and further post-processed, original |
|
![]() |
||
IC 405/410, 50 min, DuoBand filter, mosaic, gain 120, processed with Stellar Studio and further post-processed strongly, original |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
NGC 2237/2244, 50 min, DuoBand filter, mosaic, gain 120, processed with Stellar Studio, original |
NGC 2237/2244, 50 min, DuoBand filter, mosaic, gain 120, processed with Stellar Studio and further post-processed, original |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
NGC 2264, 50 min, DuoBand filter, mosaic, gain 120, processed with Stellar Studio, original |
NGC 2264, 50 min, DuoBand filter, mosaic, gain 120, processed with Stellar Studio and further post-processed, original |
In progress
Here, I describe my very first experiences with the Dwarf mini from the first 11 observation sessions (Mühlhausen/Kraichgau).
At first I only observed in AZ mode because I first had to get familiar with the Dwarf mini. But unlike the Vaonis telescopes, the Dwarf mini also offers an EQ mode. However, apart from a few failed attempts with a wedge for the Sky-Watcher AZ-GTi mount, I have not been able to gain any experience with this type of mount. In this respect, I was breaking new ground with the EQ mode of the Dwarf mini. And it took a few attempts until I understood how to set it up and how to interpret the instructions provided by the DwarfLab app. More about this on page EQ Mode.
Compared to the Singularity app for the Vaonis Vesperas, the DwarfLab app is quite different and unusual. There are some things I did not find right away, and some I find very "hidden". It is also strange that you cannot access the observation screen from everywhere; instead, I always have to go back to the home screen and then select "Photos".
During my first sessions I also had to struggle a lot with fog, which quickly put an end to the observations. Later it was more clouds that forced me to stop, but they usually came a little later...
The use of filters turned out to be another "pitfall" that I was not the only one to encounter. For example, in the Atlas, the app displays "Duo" for an object, i.e. the DualBand filter. But when you start observing and use automatic settings, you photograph with the standard "Astro" filter. Why this is the case, has not yet been clarified. So my current recommendation is to always check which filter is actually selected and, if necessary, to use the manual settings.
On a related note, there is another problem I encountered with the Rosette Nebula. If you select the star cluster NGC 2244, which is located in the middle of the Rosette Nebula NGC 2237 & co, the astro filter is suggested. This is true for a star cluster in itself, but not if it is in the middle of an emission nebula!
With the Rosette Nebula you can select different objects, including simply by moving the objects in the field of view, but only NGC 2237 is displayed with "Duo" (and then still not photographed with it, at least not with the automatic settings). Here too, my recommendation is to always check which filter is actually selected and, if necessary, to select the manual settings.
More in due course...
In preparation
It took me some time to really get to grips with the DwarfLab app, and I am sure there are still some "white spots"... It also took some time to understand how to set up the EQ mode; but now I believe that is the case.
| 19.02.2026 |