Panasonic TZ202: JPG Compression Comparisons

Introduction: Photo Style | Test Photos | Conclusions | References

On this page, I try to compare the JPG compression modes "Fine" and "Standard" on the basis of photos that I took for comparing Photo Style variations at various ISO values.

 

Introduction

When I took photos for comparing different Photo Style settings at various ISO values, I took these photos at the two JPG compression modes "Fine" and "Standard". This allows me to reuse then for comparing the JPG compression modes. According to author Franck Späth, there is little visible difference between the two compression modes. And it looks, as if my tests point into the same direction...

 

Test Photos

For these tests, I took more or less identical photos of the same scene:

    

About the photos:

Settings: Aperture f/6.4, ISO values between 125 and 1600, EV -0.7, a focal length of 360 mm (equiv.), JPG compression = Fine, Diffraction Compensation = Auto, i.Resolution = Auto.

Photo Style was set to the values as given below.

Quality (JPG compression) was set to Fine or High.

Click the photo sections to open 100% versions of them in a new window. The original photos can be downloaded by clicking the links below the sections.

Section 1

Quality = Fine

 

Quality = Standard

Photo Style = contr. +2, sharpn. +2, noise -5
 
Photo Style = contr. +2, sharpn. +2, noise -5
    

ISO 125 (original)

 

ISO 125 (original)

 

ISO 200 (original)

 

ISO 200 (original)

 

ISO 400 (original)

 

ISO 400 (original)

 

ISO 800 (original)

 

ISO 800 (original)

 

ISO 1600 (original)

 

ISO 1600 (original)

Quality = Fine

 

Quality = Standard

Photo Style = Standard
 
Photo Style = Standard
 

ISO 125 (original)

 

ISO 125 (original)

 

ISO 200 (original)

 

ISO 200 (original)

 

ISO 400 (original)

 

ISO 400 (original)

 

ISO 800 (original)

 

ISO 800 (original)

 

ISO 1600 (original)

 

ISO 1600 (original)

Section 2

Quality = Fine

 

Quality = Standard

Photo Style = contr. +2, sharpn. +2, noise -5
 
Photo Style = contr. +2, sharpn. +2, noise -5
    

ISO 125 (original)

 

ISO 125 (original)

 

ISO 200 (original)

 

ISO 200 (original)

 

ISO 400 (original)

 

ISO 400 (original)

 

ISO 800 (original)

 

ISO 800 (original)

 

ISO 1600 (original)

 

ISO 1600 (original)

Quality = Fine

 

Quality = Standard

Photo Style = Standard
 
Photo Style = Standard
 

ISO 125 (original)

 

ISO 125 (original)

 

ISO 200 (original)

 

ISO 200 (original)

 

ISO 400 (original)

 

ISO 400 (original)

 

ISO 800 (original)

 

ISO 800 (original)

 

ISO 1600 (original)

 

ISO 1600 (original)

Section 3

Quality = Fine

 

Quality = Standard

Photo Style = contr. +2, sharpn. +2, noise -5
 
Photo Style = contr. +2, sharpn. +2, noise -5
    

ISO 125 (original)

 

ISO 125 (original)

 

ISO 200 (original)

 

ISO 200 (original)

 

ISO 400 (original)

 

ISO 400 (original)

 

ISO 800 (original)

 

ISO 800 (original)

 

ISO 1600 (original)

 

ISO 1600 (original)

Quality = Fine

 

Quality = Standard

Photo Style = Standard
 
Photo Style = Standard
 

ISO 125 (original)

 

ISO 125 (original)

 

ISO 200 (original) - somewhat fuzzy...

 

ISO 200 (original)

 

ISO 400 (original)

 

ISO 400 (original)

 

ISO 800 (original)

 

ISO 800 (original)

 

ISO 1600 (original)

 

ISO 1600 (original)

 

Conclusions

The test photos on this page are no "scientific work" and should have been done with a tripod and perhaps with manual focus.

I cannot see any differences in the samples caused by differences in the JPG compression, and this seems to be independent of the ISO values.

After all, I do not have the impression that my photos are suitable for finding differences between the two compression modes, because there is already too much variance in the photos. Nevertheless, you can download the originals, and perhaps they are useful for making up your mind on your own...

 

References

 

An den Anfang   Homepage  

gerd (at) waloszek (dot) de

About me
made by walodesign on a mac!
26.02.2019